Enough with the silence: the ICC Prosecutor must speak and act on the situation in Israel and Palestine

(Photo: EPA, 2014)

Update: on 12 October, the ICC Prosecutor spoke with Anthony Deutsch and Stephanie van den Berg on the situation in Palestine and Israel. His comments can be found here.

The world is once again witnessing mass atrocities committed against civilians in Palestine and Israel. The scenes are heartbreaking and horrific. They demand a response based not on furthering more violence and suffering but based on fostering justice and accountability. There is only one independent, international institution that could investigate and prosecute these international crimes: the International Criminal Court (ICC). 

The ICC has jurisdiction over the territory of Gaza and international crimes committed by Palestinian factions, including Hamas. In 2021, the ICC Prosecutor opened an official investigation into the situation in Palestine. This came in the wake of the Prosecutor’s Office determination that “war crimes have been or are being committed by Palestinian and Israeli actors in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip”. 

Among those ongoing crimes that the ICC can and should investigate are the deliberate targeting of civilians, taking civilians hostages, as well as indiscriminate bombing campaigns. In addition, there is a clear and obvious risk that some of Israel’s planned conduct may amount to collective punishment – punishing the broader Palestinian population for Hamas’ atrocities – which is a war crime under the Geneva Conventions

A United Nations Commission of Inquiry continues to collect evidence of atrocities committed in Israel and Palestine and has recently stated that “there is already clear evidence that war crimes may have been committed in the latest explosion of violence in Israel and Gaza.” Human Rights Watch has also described war crimes committed on both sides and noted that such atrocities would continue “so long as human rights and accountability are disregarded.”

In response to this most recent spate of atrocities, the ICC’s Office of the Prosecutor issued a statement replying to journalist Alice Speri. It said that the Prosecutor’s investigation is ongoing, that the current conflict falls under the Court’s jurisdiction, and invited those with “relevant information” to send it to the Court. That is good, but not good enough. Why is ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan silent in the face of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Israel and Palestine? 

No matter what the Prosecutor says or does, the ICC alone cannot stop the violence in Palestine and Israel. But he and the Court have a role. Beyond investigating ongoing international crimes and issuing arrest warrants for those most responsible for atrocities in the situation in Palestine, the Prosecutor should clearly and unequivocally condemn the violence and promise to address it with all of the powers available to him.

In office since 2021, Mr. Khan appears convinced that symbolic actions are not worth it. As a result, statements by him deploring violence or warning parties that they could be investigated and prosecuted by the ICC are rare. But they have been issued in the past, including in February 2022, when Khan announced that he was closely watching events in Ukraine. Did his words stop the violence and Russian aggression? No. Did it matter? Absolutely.

Even if pronouncements condemning atrocities and warning perpetrators are symbolic, such gestures matter. Being the victim or survivor of an atrocity can be extremely isolating. Strong statements (see here for a model), from the ICC Prosecutor can demonstrate solidarity and indicate that the Court is on the side of those whose basic human rights are being violated. They remind the world that the Court is watching and that it has a role to play. It signals that the ICC is relevant and that the lives of those being murdered, starved, raped, bombed, and kidnapped, matter. It might not deter such atrocities, but it is always worth trying.

What may also explain Prosecutor Khan’s reluctance to speak out on atrocities committed in Israel and Palestine is his view that he prefers to focus on situations and investigations where there is a high probability that accountability can be delivered. Indeed, this was the reason why he “deprioritized” his investigation into alleged war crimes committed by U.S. forces in Afghanistan. But then Khan issued an arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin, a sitting head of state who is unlikely to be arrested or held accountable any time soon. Going after Putin was the right thing to do, but it went against the purported strategy of focusing on investigations in situations where the likelihood of arrest and therefore accountability was high. 

Given the extent of Western opposition to the ICC’s investigation into Palestine, Mr. Khan might therefore believe that it is not worth it to act. He would be wrong.

As in Ukraine, evidence of mass atrocities committed in Palestine and Israel is ample. No matter their political postures on the conflict, no one denies this basic fact. Victims and survivors of war crimes and crimes against humanity everywhere deserve justice and accountability. They deserve to know whether the ICC is with on their side. That cannot happen if the Prosecutor remains both silent and inactive in the face of mounting evidence of international crimes being committed. 

Speaking up and acting is also in the ICC’s interest – even if it won’t secure arrests or prosecutions in the near term. Whether rightly or wrongly, there are many who hold suspicions that the ICC Prosecutor would prefer to focus on Ukraine, where Western support is greater, than the situation in Palestine. It is in Mr. Khan’s interests – and the interest of the Court – to dispel them of that notion.

Unlike many other international organizations, the Court matters in the context of the situation in Palestine. If the Prosecutor does not speak up or act in the face of such grievous crimes as are currently being committed, he risks irrelevancy in precisely the kind of situation of mass atrocity that it was created to respond to.

So, to you, Mr. Khan:

Your voice matters. Please use it. 

Your Office matters. Please act.

Unknown's avatar

About Mark Kersten

Mark Kersten is an Assistant Professor in the Criminology and Criminal Justice Department at the University of the Fraser Valley in British Columbia, Canada, and a Senior Consultant at the Wayamo Foundation in Berlin, Germany. Mark is the founder of the blog Justice in Conflict and author of the book, published by Oxford University Press, by the same name. He holds an MSc and PhD in International Relations from the London School of Economics and a BA (Hons) from the University of Guelph. Mark has previously been a Research Associate at the Refugee Law Project in Uganda, and as researcher at Justice Africa and Lawyers for Justice in Libya in London. He has taught courses on genocide studies, the politics of international law, transitional justice, diplomacy, and conflict and peace studies at the London School of Economics, SOAS, and University of Toronto. Mark’s research has appeared in numerous academic fora as well as in media publications such as The Globe and Mail, Al Jazeera, BBC, Foreign Policy, the CBC, Toronto Star, and The Washington Post. He has a passion for gardening, reading, hockey (on ice), date nights, late nights, Lego, and creating time for loved ones.
This entry was posted in International Criminal Court (ICC), International Criminal Justice, Israel, Palestine, Palestine and the ICC and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Enough with the silence: the ICC Prosecutor must speak and act on the situation in Israel and Palestine

  1. Ghany's avatar Ghany says:

    I’d prefer to see the prosecutor not speaking if his speech would sound like yours. Your speech is part of the atrocity propaganda that justifies the ongoing genocide in Gaza. I guess it’s legally safe to say the word genocide bearing in mind the actions of the ground on the one hand, and Israeli officials statements on the other.

  2. Awesome post Mark!

    As a reminder …

    REMINDING UN MEMBER-STATES OF UNGA Resolution 73/305

    Pursuant to UNGA Resolution 73/305 adopted on 28 June 2019 which reaffirmed inter alia that Member States have the primary responsibility in countering terrorism and supporting victims of terrorism, reiterating its unequivocal condemnation of all acts, methods and practices of terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, wherever and by whomsoever committed, regardless of their motivation, as criminal and unjustifiable, and renewing its unwavering commitment to strengthening international cooperation to prevent and combat terrorism, and to deny impunity and pursue accountability in relation to the perpetrators of terrorist acts and their supporters, etc.

    Reminding the United Nations of its obligation to support the victims of the latest acts of terrorism.

  3. Already reported by The Guardian in May 2011 Mark. It was just a matter if time :

    Now very much like Al-Qaeda, Hamas kills Victims of Various/Diverse Nationalities Indiscriminately in Its Acts of Terrorism.

    … noted doctrinal differences between Bin Laden’s al-Qaida and Hamas which sees itself as primarily a nationalist movement rather than an international movement.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/may/02/hamas-osama-bin-laden

  4. Ghany's avatar Ghany says:

    Hey. Now he spoke. Did you like that?

    He stayed silent for 22 days during which 10,000 people were killed, and then finally woke up, only to talk as if we were still on 7 October. He scrutinised the conduct of Palestinian groups on that day, but does he know what has happened since then?
    The only interpretation I have is that he has been in come, from 7 October noon and he just woke up now. Does he know that thousands of Palestinians have been massacred & that Gaza has been destroyed?

    He spoke for ten minutes, within which he hasn’t mentioned at any point the Israeli conduct of hostilities! It is not until the 9th min. that he starts talking about Palestinians, to abruptly address them as some kind of victims of the evil of war, caught in the midst of hostilities, etc. No mention of Israeli officials public statements, of massive evidence of intentional targeting, of publicly known plans to remove the population of Gaza and resettle in the Sinai.

    Absolutely impressive! I am very curious to know. Do you think his ‘silence’ was really worse than what he said?

Leave a comment