New Book Alert! Hybrid Justice: Innovation and Impact in the Prosecution of Atrocity Crimes 

Dear readers,

I am very happy and excited to announce the publication of a new book, co-edited by Kirsten Ainley and myself, entitled Hybrid Justice: Innovation and Impact in the Prosecution of Atrocity Crimes.

The volume is the product of the Hybrid Justice Project. Here is a synopsis of the book:

The last decade has seen the unexpected re-emergence of hybrid and internationalized courts, tribunals which operate with varying combinations of national and international law, procedure, and staff. The permanent International Criminal Court (ICC) should have made such hybrid mechanisms largely obsolete, yet hybrids have recently been established or proposed for crimes committed in Chad, South Sudan, Israel/Palestine, the Central African Republic, Kosovo, Syria, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, The Gambia, and Liberia, among others. One of the most pressing conversations in international criminal law is whether and how a hybrid tribunal can be set up to address Russia’s commission of the crime of aggression in Ukraine. Hybrid courts are often a response to the need to make justice more—albeit not entirely—local. They operate with differing degrees and elements of national and international law and staff. Some hold proceedings in the relevant situation country, others in third-party states, and yet others offer a mix of both. All contribute significantly to the broader ‘system’ of international criminal justice. This edited volume examines the resurgence of hybrids. The contributors—lawyers, academics, and activists—offer analyses of the ways in which hybrids have succeeded or failed to achieve their objectives and, in doing so, help to clarify what makes hybrids more or less likely to succeed in their mandates and impacts. The authors focus on hybrid courts and resilience: the resilience of hybrid mechanisms to withstand political and other pressures in order to deliver justice and accountability, and the potential contribution of hybrids to the resilience of affected communities. Chapters are grouped into sections on the fields, practices, innovations, and impacts of hybrid courts, to draw out lessons for the future of hybrid justice.

And here are the chapters and (fantastic!) contributors:

Kirsten and I owe a massive debt of gratitude to all of the authors, editors, and to our loved ones. Thank you for your care, devotion, and patience.

For anyone interested in copies of the book, Oxford University Press has provide a 30% discount code: AUFLY30, valid on orders placed via global.oup.com/academic. See more in the flyer below.

Unknown's avatar

About Mark Kersten

Mark Kersten is an Assistant Professor in the Criminology and Criminal Justice Department at the University of the Fraser Valley in British Columbia, Canada, and a Senior Consultant at the Wayamo Foundation in Berlin, Germany. Mark is the founder of the blog Justice in Conflict and author of the book, published by Oxford University Press, by the same name. He holds an MSc and PhD in International Relations from the London School of Economics and a BA (Hons) from the University of Guelph. Mark has previously been a Research Associate at the Refugee Law Project in Uganda, and as researcher at Justice Africa and Lawyers for Justice in Libya in London. He has taught courses on genocide studies, the politics of international law, transitional justice, diplomacy, and conflict and peace studies at the London School of Economics, SOAS, and University of Toronto. Mark’s research has appeared in numerous academic fora as well as in media publications such as The Globe and Mail, Al Jazeera, BBC, Foreign Policy, the CBC, Toronto Star, and The Washington Post. He has a passion for gardening, reading, hockey (on ice), date nights, late nights, Lego, and creating time for loved ones.
This entry was posted in Books and Publications, Hybrid Court for South Sudan, Hybrid Courts, Hybrid Tribunals and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to New Book Alert! Hybrid Justice: Innovation and Impact in the Prosecution of Atrocity Crimes 

  1. harlanlwilkerson's avatar harlanlwilkerson says:

    The Jerusalem Post story today about the Hannibal Directive and other stories from the press should be used to put an end to Leahy Act debate on terminated military aid or petitioning USA for warrants in the ICC.

    No State can be allowed to murder its own soldiers to prevent them from becoming Prisoners Of War and ignore the prohibitions of the 3rd Geneva Convention. Even worse is the notion that any State can order its soldiers to murder its own civilians in violation of the common article 3 prohibition against “murder of civilians at all times and in all places”.

    The question is why we are sanctioning the ICC here in the USA and giving billions of US dollars in weapons to that State? Our Constitution, the UN Charter that our government ratified, and our Leahy statutes prohibit it.

    https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-844008

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-09-07/israel-hannibal-directive-kidnap-hamas-gaza-hostages-idf/104224430?utm_campaign=abc_news_web&utm_content=link&utm_medium=content_shared&utm_source=abc_news_web

Leave a comment